Hi Brian,
> > Question to the WG: given the current state of HIP, do we
> > want to consider dependency on HIP as
> >
> > a) acceptable
> > b) unacceptable?
> >
> > Brian (co-chair hat on)
> >
>
> There really wasn't much response to this one, but my reading of the
> sparse consensus was against solutions that depend on the deployment
> of HIP (but that does not exclude taking ideas or components of HIP).
I don't think Multi6 & HIP should fate-share. In other words, I think that
Multi6 could work on something independent of HIP, if the WG felt that
was the proper direction for the work.
John
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.