Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-02.txt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


	Brian,

On 2004-07-26, at 09.15, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>
> 1. I am uncomfortable about the dependency on reverse DNS. It will 
> effectively
> mean that only well-run servers can benefit from mh, because client 
> systems
> with temporary addresses (especially RFC 3041 addresses) are 
> realistically
> unlikely to have reverse DNS in place. And that probably eliminates mh 
> for
> peer-to-peer applications too, which is a shame.


While I kind of agree with what you are saying, I still think that mh 
benefits might be a good encouragement to fix the reverse three. And 
with secure dynamic updates we might have a way to do that. But I guess 
I am just being overly optimistic.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQQW9qKarNKXTPFCVEQJjWQCghOHSxv3Dbspyx4jfG00m0H2SovcAn1ge
yH6In9hLMUcaDi8qsEGULgHZ
=mWWD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----