Re: Unique identifiers and privacy

On 26-jul-04, at 11:24, Pekka Nikander wrote:

> In my opinion, it is also important to make it sufficiently hard
> to link the network layer identifiers of a mobile user.

[...]

> Mobile IPv6
> fails miserably, unfortunately.  MULTI6 should not make the situation
> any worse,  and preferably should make it better.

I disagree that this is something that's relevant to multi6, as with 
site multihoming the relation between the different addresses is more 
or less permanent and therefore trying to hide it makes little sense.

As for mobility: is the header that contains the "real" address (I 
forget the lingo, sorry) encrypted by IPsec? I see no reason it 
wouldn't be. And if it is, this is a solved problem and people should 
just use IPsec.