Re: Newbie Question about addressing impacts

Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Organization IBM
Message-ID <[email protected]>
One of the components we have already identified (see the minutes
from San Diego) is

  Locator selection after a failure has been detected / Choose new address pair

RFC 3484 policy distribution might be a possible solution
for that component. We aren't chartered to do basic design in
this WG, but it would certainly be good to see proof-of-concept
for this (and every) component.

      Brian


Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
> Oops, I forgot to send CC to multi6.
> 
> -- 
> Hi marcelo,
> 
>> Well, even if you do a per host locator selection you can still manage 
>> policy in a centralized fashion, if we define proper mechanisms to 
>> perform policy distribution, for instance a dhcp option for 
>> distributing RFC3484 policy table or something similar. However, i 
>> don't know how you can enforce policy in a centralized manner when 
>> locator selection is performed by the end hosts.
> 
> 
> I believe that such a mechanism for policy distribution
> is really important. By making use of the existing RFC3484
> framework, IMHO we can develop much manageable multi-home
> environment in a simple and easy manner.
> 
> Now I'm working on this mechanism to publish a new I-D.
> But I'm not sure such kind of topic is appropriate for
> this WG or not. I believe this part of the technology should
> be necessary for some of the proposals discussed here, though.
> 
> -- 
> Arifumi Matsumoto
>     Ubiquitous Computing Project
>     NTT Information Sharing Platform Laboratories
>     E-mail: [email protected]
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.