Re: Newbie Question about addressing impacts

>> Years ago, we rejected (a) on the grounds that it would change IPv6
>
> Well, my understanding is that this is still a valid approach to the 
> problem, and i didn't get the feeling that we have rejected it (at 
> least since i am in this wg), so, may i ask why did you reject this 
> approach?


Umm.... as I alluded "we" (not I ;-) rejected this approach because 
there are existing
IPv6 host implementations.  Those would have to be 'revised' to support 
this model.
At the time, the WG felt that this was unacceptable.

Tony