Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
Cedric de Launois <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:31:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Universite Catholique de Louvain |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le ven 22/10/2004 à 14:28, Iljitsch van Beijnum a écrit : > "When considering dual-homed IPv6stubs, we see in fig. 13 or in fig. 14 > that the path diversity observed is already as good as the path > diversity of a 25-homed IPv4 stub." > > :-) > > But the question is: will this help us or hurt us? Basically, BGP > doesn't really know what the best path is, but it can usually detect > and avoid the bad ones. So you pretty much always get something > reasonable. With multi-address multihoming you get many more paths, > some of which are better than what BGP would have given you, but a lot > are worse. So the trick is to select the best one, or at least avoid > the bad ones. How do we do this? Good question ! I'm currently working exactly at this point. And I have a pretty fair solution (I believe)... I can't say more just now, but expect some news from me about that in two or three weeks ;) Cedric