Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
Cedric de Launois <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:36:39 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Universite Catholique de Louvain |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le ven 22/10/2004 à 17:01, Michael H. Lambert a écrit : > Given that the "best path" probably just has meaning for a given > application between given hosts at a given point in time, how often do > we *really* need the *best* path? The goal is not much to have the *best* path, but to avoid really bad paths. > Best effort usually works well enough for forwarding--why shouldn't it > do the same for path selection? (I think Noel implied this in his > response--to use his highway analogy: in driving from Boston to San > Francisco saving six hours is good, saving ten minutes is (usually) > irrelevant?) > > Since the One True Best Path is likely unknowable anyway, why > complicate path selection by building SVCs (or MPLS tunnels) into it? In the multi-address multi6 case, path selection is simply done by selecting the right source and destination prefixes. If a host can figure out which are the couples (src,dst) prefixes to avoid, then the benefit can be huge. This doesn't require tunnels in any ways. Cedric