RE: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
<[email protected]> Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:00:58 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jari, Marcelo, > > So we don't really need to know information about all the possible > > complete paths, just the ingress and egress parts of the path. I guess > > that this problem is more reduced and less ambitious than the general one. > > Right. > > The other reduction is that I'm not sure we need to solve > the "best path" problem but solving even the "a working > path" problem might be sufficient. That's at least my > preference. Exactly; my thought has always been that we need to avoid the non-working path(s) & that would be sufficient. John