RE: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming

<[email protected]> Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:00:58 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jari, Marcelo,

> > So we don't really need to know information about all the possible 
> > complete paths, just the ingress and egress parts of the path. I guess 
> > that this problem is more reduced and less ambitious than the general one.
> 
> Right.
> 
> The other reduction is that I'm not sure we need to solve
> the "best path" problem but solving even the "a working
> path" problem might be sufficient. That's at least my
> preference.

Exactly; my thought has always been that we need to avoid
the non-working path(s) & that would be sufficient.

John