Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming

Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:19:02 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 25-okt-04, at 14:30, <[email protected]> wrote:

> So, multihoming triggering mechanisms are out of scope for Multi6,
> except for link failure ... I would agree that the API should be
> out of scope.

I agree that an API for this is something for a later day.

However, we do need to create a reachability measuring mechanism that 
is flexible enough that it can be made smarter at some time in the 
future while maintaining backward compatibility, as having several of 
these mechanisms is a huge waste and deploying new ones will be hard 
because both ends must support it before it can do anything useful.