Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nordmark-multi6dt-shim-00.txt
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:11:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-11-03, at 01.28, Erik Nordmark wrote: > If a host wants to prevent packet injection attacks today (such as > spoofed RCP RST packets, if it wants to prevent it from all nodes and > not depend on ingress filtering, wouldn't it use IPsec? That would have to be a must. I can't see anyone building a trust model based on (the non-existing) ingress filtering. That said, I think most protection against packet injection attacks on todays Internet is actually left to ULPs. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQYiElKarNKXTPFCVEQJO4ACfQ6Swyp03I6EaKoaeQkmw1mvzkC0AoI/W gCUKJxD5fCvv0QHhexPyBDmy =hqua -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----