Re: Few comments on draft-ietf-multi6-architecture-02

El 04/11/2004, a las 9:00, Thierry Ernst escribió:
>
> OK for the 1st case, but in the second case (the nemo has 2 home
> networks), I would rather see the multihoming occuring between the
> nemo and the home network.
>
>          home network 1
>              |  _AR
>   |  _-p1/56-|-|_|- p1/48 -- Internet
>   |-|_| MR      _
>   |   -p2/56-|-|_|- p2/48 -- Internet
>              |   AR
>          home network 2
>
>

ok, sorry for not fully specifying my idea. I was thinking about the 
case where there is a single MR and two HAs, in which case, the 
situation is less clear. anyway, i guess that the key issue is the 
point below...


>> However, when we are considering a nemo that has multiple attachments
>> points, and for instance only one nemo prefix, then the fundamental
>> assumption of multi6 solution is no longer valid, since the nemo has a
>> single prefix. I guess that in these cases, the usefulness of the
>> multi6 solution will diminish.
>
> Agree. In such case, I wouldn't consider the nemo as a "site" therefore
> the site-multihoming solution wouldn't apply.
>
>> But anyway, i fell that it is very important to determine which parts
>> of the nemo multihoming problem can be addressed with multi6 and which
>> parts will require additional tools.
>
> Identifying which parts can be addressed by existing solutions of WG is
> something that we should definitely clarify in
> draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues.

yes, imho this is the first thing that we should do with multihoming in 
nemo, but for this we need to understand the basic multi6 solution, i 
guess, which is still not defined...

regards, marcelo


>
> Thierry.
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------
Please note that my former email address
[email protected] is no longer in use
Please send mail to:
marcelo at it dot uc3m dot es
------------------------------------------