Re: multi6 WG Last Calls closed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


(co-chair hat-off)

On 2004-11-04, at 09.24, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> In my opinion, the two big open issues are
>
>  draft-ietf-multi6-v4-multihoming-02.txt
>  Thierry Ernst: "to be honest, I don't
>    really understand the value of the document."
>
>  As I already said, we are chartered to produce this document,
>  but its value is indeed "for the record". Does the WG think that
>  is enough to justify publication?

I have no real strong feeling one way or the other. I do think that we 
want this documented somewhere and if not in a separate document 
perhaps this could be fitted into the architectural analysis? But I am 
not sure that is the best place and I think that might add length to an 
already quite long document.

>  draft-ietf-multi6-architecture-02.txt
>  Pekka Savola: "The document is rather long and conversational
>    in tone." (plus specific comments related to this view).
>
>  Does the WG agree with Pekka, to the point of asking for a
>  major revision effort?

No.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQY0NEaarNKXTPFCVEQL7AwCcDLTwBZSQBnwSkmyu0ME/1FiQIj8An0R8
4QqXK6TtXeeXqS0tAO6rVEIk
=YXB9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----