Multi6 next steps - consensus call

Multi6 people,

At the meetings this week, the design team drafts were discussed,
and consensus in the room was positive for the following questions:

1. Do we agree that the way forward is the direction and
    work produced by the design team [modulo the missing pieces,
    including choosing site-exit routers]?

2. Do we agree on the need for a solution architecture document?

3. Do we agree to recommend a new working group in the Internet Area
    to follow up the design team approach?

4. Do we agree to close down multi6 when its current work is done?

If you *disagree* with any of the above, please respond to the
list, with a short explanation, in the next few days.

    Brian + Kurtis
    co-chairs

PS: the drafts in question are
     Multihoming Level 3 Shim Approach
     (draft-nordmark-multi6dt-shim-00.txt)
     Hash Based Addresses (HBA)
     (draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt)
     Functional decomposition of the M6 protocol
     (draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-functional-dec-00.txt)
     Failure Detection and Locator Selection in Multi6
     (draft-arkko-multi6dt-failure-detection-00.txt)
     Multi6 Application Referral Issues
     (draft-nordmark-multi6dt-refer-00.txt)