RE: Comments on draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt

On 15 November 2004 15:55, [email protected] () wrote:

> Francis Dupont wrote:
> ...
>> PS: BTW CGA IPR holders provide royalty-free licenses only for SEND,
>> can they update their IPR texts on the IETF web for HBAs too?
> 
> We could leave this issue until we have a WG chartered and
> an item intended for the standards track. But it would be nice.

Note that KAME at least have concerns with the SeND IPR such that they
are refusing to implement. If there's a revision to IPR statements
taking place for HBA, perhaps this also creates an opportunity to
address KAME's concerns.

Regards,

Mat