Re: Comments on draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt

Mohan Parthasarathy wrote:

> If you want to have an address that can be used both
> by SEND and Multi6, then you would generate an address
> that includes both the public key and multi-prefix
> extension as defined now. But my original question
> was more specific to HBA addresses that can be
> generated for all prefixes with the same identifier.
> HBA only addresses anyway requires slightly
> different processing. So, i don't know what
> the issue is with generating the same identifier,
> if needed or someone finds a use for it.

OK - sorry for misunderstanding.

I think Marcelo stated the issues today.

What do you see as the benefit of having the same iid for all prefixes?

    Erik