Re: mumti6dt drafts as WG drafts?

Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:22:31 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Organization IBM
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The comments on this didn't amount to significant objections, so
we will adopt the next versions of these drafts as WG drafts.

Authors - please tell the co-chairs what filenames you want
within draft-ietf-multi6-*, so that we can authorize them

    Brian

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> In accordance with the consensus to proceed with the direction
> proposed by the design team, does anyone object to the next versions
> of the following drafts being formally adopted as WG drafts?
> This would mean they have names like draft-ietf-multi6-*
> 
> Please let us know this week if you object, and why.
> 
>     Multihoming Level 3 Shim Approach
>     (draft-nordmark-multi6dt-shim-00.txt)
>     Hash Based Addresses (HBA)
>     (draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt)
>     Functional decomposition of the M6 protocol
>     (draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-functional-dec-00.txt)
>     Failure Detection and Locator Selection in Multi6
>     (draft-arkko-multi6dt-failure-detection-00.txt)
>     Multi6 Application Referral Issues
>     (draft-nordmark-multi6dt-refer-00.txt)
> 
> 
>    Brian
>    multi6 co-chair
>