Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing

Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On 2005-01-17, at 09.42, Pasi Sarolahti wrote:
> 
> 
>>This would support a larger set of possible re-homing scenarios, and I
>>think it is compatible with the wordings of re-homing definition in
>>draft-ietf-multi6-architecture-03.txt.
>>
>>I had a short off-list mail exchange with Marcelo and Jari and they
>>agreed, but recommended to solicit the list opinion as well.
> 
> 
> I have no objections to the text leaving this possibility open,

ditto

> but I 
> have some more concerns about actually implementing this.

In a sense, it's to leave this door open that I've been arguing
over on shim6 that we should separate the state machine (and by
implication, its APIs) from the shim6 protocol.

    Brian