AW: Evaluation of Multihoming Solutions

hi martin,=20

you might also be interested to take a look at the following document:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nagarajan-multi6-comparison-00=
.txt

ciao
hannes


> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Martin Dunmore [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2005 12:59
> An: [email protected]
> Cc: Graca Carvalho; Edwards, Christopher
> Betreff: Evaluation of Multihoming Solutions
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> As part of the 6NET project (http://www.6net.org) we are producing a
> document that is attempting to evaluate the different=20
> multihoming proposals
> that have surfaced in the last couple of years or so.
>=20
> The latest draft is publicly available on the 6NET website...
> http://www.6net.org/publications/other/multihoming.pdf  (pdf version)
> http://www.6net.org/publications/other/multihoming.doc  (ms=20
> word version)
>=20
> The draft still has a few holes (see email below) but it=20
> would be beneficial
> to get any feedback from people on the multi6 list.
>=20
> Regards,
> Martin
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On=20
> Behalf Of Dunmore,
> Martin
> Sent: 25 January 2005 22:42
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [6net wp4] D4.5.3 draft available
>=20
>=20
> I've placed the latest draft of D4.5.3 Evaluation of=20
> Multihoming Solutions
> on the website in WP4/Contributions section.
>=20
> It still needs a bit of work and I'm hoping the chaps that=20
> are savvy with
> multihoming can give me some feedback and/or contribute some=20
> more text.
>=20
> In particular we need to ask...
>=20
> Is the structure ok?
> Have I missed any important solutions?
> Some proposals have expired as internet drafts... does that=20
> mean we should
> leave them out?=20
>=20
> The main section I could do with some help on is the=20
> conclusions section
> where I'm hoping to evaluate the various proposals based on=20
> the goals in
> rfc3852 and then suggest some sensible way forward for people=20
> wishing to do
> multihoing in IPv6. It's a little empty at the moment as I've=20
> not had time
> to analyse and cross reference everything.
>=20
> The few sections with missing text aren't much of a problem=20
> as I can fill
> them in myself. Although if anyone has text they can offer...=20
> please feel
> free ;-)
>=20
> Other than that it needs general spit and polish and filling in a few
> blanks! Perhaps also some more diagrams.
>=20
> Regards,
> Martin
> ----------------------------------------
> Dr Martin Dunmore=20
> Research Associate=20
> Computing Department
> InfoLab 21, South Drive
> Lancaster University
> Lancaster, LA1 4WA
> UK
> Tel: +44 (0)1524 510382=20
> Fax: +44 (0)1524 510492=20
> Mob: +44 (0)7866 676930
> ------------------------------------------
>=20
>=20