Re: how mobile do we want to be
"Armando L. Caro, Jr." <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:10:41 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > In the discussion in the BOF yesterday there were different viewpoints > on the relationship between mobility and multihoming in general and > shim6 in particular. > > Apparently, some people are equating renumbering with mobility. Now > obviously mobility mechanisms can be used to renumber without skipping > a beat, but that doesn't mean mobility and renumbering are the same > thing. > > I think the important difference is the timescale. In mobility, the > assumption is that TCP sessions and other state are longer-lived than > locator addresses. In site renumbering, I very much doubt that this is > the case. At the very least, we're talking about the order of days > here, and _very_ few sessions or associations last for days. I don't know what you call "_very_ few", but I can think of three applications that I use daily which have long lived TCP connections... often lasting days or more. These three are ssh (with tunneled apps), IM (aol, yahoo), and mp3 streaming (as a listener). I probably wouldn't care _too_ much if they broke occasionally due to renumbering and I had to restart them, but if this behavior became frequent, then it would become annoying. However, I can only speak for myself. There may be others (eg, mp3 streaming servers) who would find it more than annoying if it happened at all. <snip> > I think HBAs are a very good compromise between reasonable security and > usability. It would be a shame to throw this out the window just so one > or two applications are saved from reconnecting once in a blue moon. How much demand for timeliness do you think is enough to justify addressing it? In my opinion, I think the fact that there are _any_ demands for it now (mobility & my 3 example apps), is reason enough to address timeliness. If timeliness isn't addressed, aren't we being short-sighted with respect to future applications? ~armando 0-- --0 | Armando L. Caro, Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | 0-- --0