Re: IPR: analysis of Microsoft patent applications
Roy Badami <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "David" == David Woodhouse <[email protected]> writes: David> When considered holistically, the domain/IP verification David> schemes don't actually manage to achieve anything more than David> CSV does -- they only give a way to determine how much to David> trust the individual mail server which is offering the David> mail. I don't think that's true. The domain/IP verification schemes directly address forgery, in a way that CSV doesn't. Think about Sender ID as a tool for senders who (for whatever reason) want to be able to prevent others from sending forged mail claiming to be from them. As a tool for recipients, Sender ID and CSV both provide a hook on which to hang reputation and accreditation systems, and I'm agnostic as to which will work better in the real world, though my feeling is that they may in fact turn out to be complementary. -roy