Re: Why we should authenticate multiple identities
Tony Finch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Meng Weng Wong wrote: > > I agree that BATV/SES are the best solution to the > stop-bogus-bounces problem, better than SPF Classic because > they can be implemented unilaterally. The cost is only > slightly higher than SPF Classic: both require domains to > corral all their users into using the domain's approved > servers. Incorrect: you can implement BATV on a per-user basis. Users can continue to work as they currently do, but if backscatter is a problem for them they can reconfigure as necessary (so that they always use authenticated message submission via the domain's home systems) and turn on BATV, without affecting other users of that domain. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ HEBRIDES BAILEY: WEST BACKING SOUTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8, BECOMING CYCLONIC LATER IN BAILEY. SHOWERS THEN RAIN. GOOD BECOMING MODERATE OR POOR.