RE: MARID to close
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Markley, Mike wrote: > Should this be construed to mean that there's still the hope and > intention to someday producing a standards-track RFC for IP-based sender > authentication? Despite the misgivings of those who think that IP-based > schemes are pointless in the face of other efforts at cryptographic > solutions, there are obviously many who think they're useful enough, and > a "real" standard would be a great thing. I think the answer given by IETF is that there can not be found at this time one solution that would reach consensus of all participants and that they will accept several solutions for EXPERIMENTAL track RFCs and after certain time and would like to see these solutions being deployed and compare the results. I would expect after one or two years one or more of these solutions that shows good results in its deployment maybe reconsidered for STANDARD track. IETF also specifically said that only solutions that are compatible with technical specs of existing RFCs would be considered even for experimental RFCs (directorate to be formed to decide if proposal moves forward or not). -- William Leibzon Elan Networks [email protected]