Re: WG to close ; Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with SPF? (new revisions)
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> wrote: > A technical review was not something SPF/Sender-ID advocates > desired. In professional fora, it is entirely inappropriate to make assertions about other people's desires, capabilities, and the like. > SMTP is a well crafted battle-scarred solution with a few odd bits > broken. It does not warrant calling an infrastructure with a 30-year history 'broken'. Alan DeKok.