Re: WG to close ; Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with SPF? (new revisions)
[email protected] (Wietse Venema)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hector Santos: > See RFC 2821 Section 3.3: > > | 3.3 Mail Transactions > | > | ..... > | > | ............. Despite the apparent > | scope of this requirement, there are circumstances in which the > | acceptability of the reverse-path may not be determined until one or > | more forward-paths (in RCPT commands) can be examined. In those > | cases, the server MAY reasonably accept the reverse-path (with a 250 > | reply) and then report problems after the forward-paths are received > | and examined. Normally, failures produce 550 or 553 replies. > > This is probably the most powerful concepts in RFC 2821 for anti-spam > operations. It opens the door for Mail From Validation and it offers > performance enhancement and overhead reductionn. We are probably among the > first, if the the only product in the market to have implemented this > recommendation. The Postfix MTA does this by default since 19990510 (May 10, 1999), according to the day-to-day log. Wietse