Re: Alternatives drafts for SUBMITTER identity

Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mxcomp
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 11:33:56AM -0700,
 william(at)elan.net <[email protected]> wrote 
 a message of 1020 lines which said:

>       5.3 Interpreting the Results of SPF
>       Verification...............6

I do not se why we should introduce a given verification (SPF) in the
draft. SUBMITTER stands by itself. Of course, it is developed mostly
for SPF but it may be used by other protocols.

My advice: drop everything related to SPF.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.