Re: Sender-ID != SPF

On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 07:29, James Couzens wrote:

[snip]

> There exists a very amusing /. post which had a would be chat involving
> client's whose names represented the various parties with vested
> interest in the outcome of this WG's efforts.  I'm not going to post it
> here but its exceptionally amusing, and unfortunately a very accurate
> representation of the events that took place here.  Hopefully we won't
> see a repeat of this in the future. 

  Unfortunately, with the apparent power-grab of RFC3929, I think we're
likely to see much, much worse.
  I was skeptical of those who said that many see the IETF as losing its
relevance.  I fear that if RFC3929 moves beyond experimental status,
then that will come true very quickly, if it's not already.

-- 
-Paul Iadonisi
 Senior System Administrator
 Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist
 Ever see a penguin fly?  --  Try Linux.
 GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets