Re: SPF deployment, was RFC 3929 on Alternative Decision ...

John Levine writes:

> 
>>> and how spammers are adapting/ Ciphertrust says they've seen more
>>> spam than good mail pass SPF checks.
> 
>>   I hope you're not implying that that's a bad thing.
> 
> No, of course not.  But it reminds us that anyone who thinks he's
> going to block a lot of spam merely by rejecting mail that fails SPF
> or any other sender/IP check is likely to be disappointed.  It may
> block some now, but spammers have reminded us that they'll adapt.

And, when they do, the methods used to fight them will adapt also.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBhYEHx9p3GYHlUOIRAq5xAJ4hKLilOwLq8gadpcNnYhAqwMMrMwCdGa21
/fO+8uJlVtAGRgT1SvxDtCc=
=1dCY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----