Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........]
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, verbatim forwarding is practiced not just by unixheads > with .forward files, but also by hosted domains, of which > there are millions in existence, and alumni / lifetime email > services like alumni.*.edu and acm.org. Which have well-known names and IP addresses, unlike "hit and run" spammers. > The hosting providers can implement workarounds, and > forwarding service providers can implement workarounds. > >From the receiver end, trusted-forwarder.org lets receivers > whitelist forwarding hosts. Exactly. There are multiple ways possible to get to a widely deployed system of checking return paths. The deployment can be gradual, with well-understood incremental benefits at each stage. > That leaves only the ad-hoc forwarding setups. For those > cases, I would like to be able to tell them "just upgrade". I agree. Alan DeKok.