Re: CSV BATV (CLEAR) DK IIM (MASS)
Douglas Otis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1102473886.5244.63.camel@littlejoy> |
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 16:29, Douglas Otis wrote: Clarification of a clarification... > The word validation with respect to SPF is a bit vague. A more accurate > term would be authorization. The lack of assurance of intervening nodes > making a consistent check or their security removes assurances as to the > originating sender. It would be better said that SPF validates the > authorizations provided by the [purported] originating sender. Although > authorization may be sufficient to assert favorable accreditations, > authentication is required to hold a domain accountable for abuse. -Doug