Re: blowback, was A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........]
David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 10:40 +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: > Here you say it again. SPF does NOT say "no forwarding". > SPF _does_ say: "No spoofing my name". You're arguing over nomenclature, which is pointless. Alex, you're right then SPF advocates do indeed phrase it as "No spoofing my name". But John is also right because what they _mean_ by that is "no forwarding", since normal forwarding does involve, and always has involved, the behaviour which SPF advocates now want to call "spoofing". The SPF advocates are suggesting that people do something else instead of normal forwarding, but they haven't really got a coherent and deployable answer yet as to _what_ else should be done. -- dwmw2