Re: Source routing -- why not?
Chip Mefford <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Levine wrote: | After further deliberation about source routing and SPF, I have come | around to the conclusion that Frank is to some degree right, and if | you want to use SPF/Sender-ID, you should use source routes. | Why not just go back to bang path? It works. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB3BIVa44x14FCa6ARArX0AJ92QcPba6HYs8VecFM9QGGMJSJz4wCff+hL 43rAj7nGpWxTl5d6kcC6PIg= =IGRv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----