RE: blowback, was A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........]

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mxcomp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dean Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 [email protected] wrote:
> 
> I think you're forgeting that _every_ user (including every spammer
> and forger, and virus-infected computer) has relay services provided
> by their provider. They have those services right up until they don't.
> 
> SPF takes for granted that the ISP's users can forge email to the ISPs
> relay, and doesn't address that problem.  This opens the possibility
> for 100% blowback.

True.  Consider Sammy Spammer using Example ISP.  They could send email all day long from [email protected], and if I reject the email on the grounds of being malware, isp.example.com's mail server is going to deluge [email protected] with lots of blowback.

But surely [email protected] can report this to Example ISP, who should have the necessary logs to be able to catch Sammy Spammer, or at least terminate their access.

> You may reject some virii. But I think you don't reject all virii

Right, I can't catch all virii.  But I can reject the ones I do catch.

Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com                 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com         Software Engineer
perl -e"map{y/a-z/l-za-k/;print}shift" "Jjhi pcdiwtg Ptga wprztg,"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.