Re: So here it is one year later...

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Dean Anderson wrote:
> 
> As you see, spam + ham does not add up to overall.  Its not clear what
> these statistics mean, nor how they were calculated.  But your
> interpretation is clearly either wrong or at least not supported by the
> page.

Sorry to reply to my own post, but there is another point I forgot: when
dealing with a very sample from a very small domain, that deals with a
limited part of the internet, E.G. a domain with relatively few people who
develop SPF, and who therefore exchange disproportionately more mail with
other SPF users, then their email statistics on SPF usage will also be
skewed.  In other words, this is not a random sample.

One needs to get better sample from someplace that doesn't particularly 
cater to SPF email users, and interacts more broadly with the internet.

		--Dean

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000