Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"

Carl Hutzler <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2005 10:47:58 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mxcomp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:

>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Arnt Gulbrandsen [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: donderdag 26 mei 2005 15:41
>>To: [email protected]
>>Cc: Mark
>>Subject: Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is
>>fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at
>>http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"
>>
>>
>>
>>Mark writes:
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>>SPF is inter-MTA based, and requires no changes to email clients
>>>whatso-frickin-ever.
>>>      
>>>
>>The first time I looked at SPF was because I wanted to ensure that an
>>email client was okay. Specifically, I wanted to check outgoing mail
>>from a roadwarrior machine, and warn the user before sending any mail
>>that would likely fail.
>>
>>That job wasn't so easy. Not so easy.
>>    
>>
>
>It is up to the ISP/MTA how to deal with their roaming users. Typically,
>SMTP AUTH / DRAC is used (that has nothing to do with SPF even, but
>everything with your ISP not being an open relay and still allowing its
>customers roaming access). So, if you send mail, from the road, through
>the relay you authorized, then that relay should SPF "pass" you (provided
>you use the correct domain name, of course).
>
>Sending through someone else's, unauthorized relay may, indeed, present a
>problem on the receiving end if they check SPF (and thus would reject your
>mail). But that is the whole point: either we allow everyone to use every
>domain name through every relay (they have access to), or we specify
>authorized relays. If we do the latter, then naturally doing the former
>will no longer work. I believe that is a good thing.
>
>It will take some mentality adjusting, though; like way back when, when
>people said: "I used to be able to send through every SMTP server I
>wanted; and now, dangit, I can only use the ones I have been given
>access to." That change, too, was a good thing.
>  
>

BTW, this issue of allowing someone to send through "someone else's 
relay" is a problem for ALL email authentication approaches except 
perhaps CSV and BATV. DomainKeys, SPF, IIM, and SID all have an issue 
until we can get MUAs to sign with DK/IIM.

-Carl

-- 
Carl Hutzler
Director, Host Mail Development
America Online
[email protected]
703.265.5521 work
703.915.6862 cell