SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/")
Tony Finch <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2005 17:14:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Carl Hutzler wrote: > > I wish there was a way to utilize the relatively large number of SPF records > in a technology like CSV. It seemed to me at one point that there was some promise that it would be possible to write an SPF record which applied only to HELO or only to PRA or only to the return path. However divergent SPF/SenderID implementations and specifications have horribly muddied the waters and I'm not sure it's possible to do this now and expect any kind of reliable interoperability. Disaster. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD.