Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/")

John Levine <[email protected]> 26 May 2005 17:08:38 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mxcomp
Organization I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> I wish there was a way to utilize the relatively large number of SPF records
>> in a technology like CSV.

Yeah.  Too bad that among SPF's many flaws is that it completely
confuses the HELO domain and the MAIL FROM domain (and on a bad day,
the domains in From:, Sender:, Resent-From:, and Resent-Sender:.)

>It seemed to me at one point that there was some promise that it
>would be possible to write an SPF record which applied only to HELO
>or only to PRA or only to the return path.

SPF 2.0 was supposed to let you specify which contexts each record is
supposed to apply to, but I agree that it'll never get any traction.