Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/")
John Levine <[email protected]> 26 May 2005 17:08:38 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Organization | I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> I wish there was a way to utilize the relatively large number of SPF records >> in a technology like CSV. Yeah. Too bad that among SPF's many flaws is that it completely confuses the HELO domain and the MAIL FROM domain (and on a bad day, the domains in From:, Sender:, Resent-From:, and Resent-Sender:.) >It seemed to me at one point that there was some promise that it >would be possible to write an SPF record which applied only to HELO >or only to PRA or only to the return path. SPF 2.0 was supposed to let you specify which contexts each record is supposed to apply to, but I agree that it'll never get any traction.