Re: SPF PASS
wayne <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2005 15:14:53 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> writes: > Terry Fielder wrote in mxcomp: > >>> Unless I'm mistaken SPF pass is specific per scope/identity >>> checked and there is no overall SPF pass. > >> That was not my understanding, but I accept being corrected >> if that's the case. > > The only "overall" thing in the actual draft is a HELO FAIL. > > Hm... or it used to be in -00, -01pre1, -01pre2, -01pre3, > -01pre4, -01pre5, but was dropped in -01pre6, -01pre7, -01. > > Now that's a bug. Wayne, please fix this back, it was no > nonsense, I don't recall any debate / resolution about it. There was debate about it. It is mentioned in the release notes. What happened is that, as part of restoring the HELO checking from draft-mengwong-spf-0[01], I copied that sentence into draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00. However, that sentence was originally part of a "RECOMMENDED algorithm", so copying that sentence caused a change in semantics. The whole "RECOMMENDED algoright" has been dropped. It is Receiver Policy anyway, not Sender Policy. -wayne