Re: SPF PASS

wayne <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2005 15:14:53 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mxcomp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In <[email protected]> Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> writes:

> Terry Fielder wrote in mxcomp:
>
>>> Unless I'm mistaken SPF pass is specific per scope/identity
>>> checked and there is no overall SPF pass.
>
>> That was not my understanding, but I accept being corrected
>> if that's the case.
>
> The only "overall" thing in the actual draft is a HELO FAIL.
>
> Hm... or it used to be in -00, -01pre1, -01pre2, -01pre3,
> -01pre4, -01pre5, but was dropped in -01pre6, -01pre7, -01.
>
> Now that's a bug.  Wayne, please fix this back, it was no
> nonsense, I don't recall any debate / resolution about it.

There was debate about it.  It is mentioned in the release notes.

What happened is that, as part of restoring the HELO checking from
draft-mengwong-spf-0[01], I copied that sentence into
draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.  However, that sentence was originally
part of a "RECOMMENDED algorithm", so copying that sentence caused a
change in semantics.  The whole "RECOMMENDED algoright" has been
dropped.  It is Receiver Policy anyway, not Sender Policy.


-wayne