Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt

"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:47:04 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mxcomp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> wrote:
> IP address space pressures has caused much of the sharing of IP
> addresses for both MTAs and Web servers.

  What's up with 29/8 & 30/8?  There are 50M addresses unused.

>  One reason to deploy a name based reputation system, is to overcome
> the problem of IP address aggregation affecting so many different
> domains.  The application of reputation makes domain/user isolation
> critical for the domain owner.

  In the absence of DNSSec, using DNS names for reputation is a bit
problematic.  You're never completely sure that the domain is
currently being controlled by it's owner.

> Once an MTA administrator buys the notion that SPF/Sender-ID takes care
> of abuse, where reputation no longer affects them directly, they have
> less incentive to do the real job of abating abuse before it is sent.

  I'm not sure there's any technical solution to that problem.

  Alan DeKok.