Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:47:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> wrote: > IP address space pressures has caused much of the sharing of IP > addresses for both MTAs and Web servers. What's up with 29/8 & 30/8? There are 50M addresses unused. > One reason to deploy a name based reputation system, is to overcome > the problem of IP address aggregation affecting so many different > domains. The application of reputation makes domain/user isolation > critical for the domain owner. In the absence of DNSSec, using DNS names for reputation is a bit problematic. You're never completely sure that the domain is currently being controlled by it's owner. > Once an MTA administrator buys the notion that SPF/Sender-ID takes care > of abuse, where reputation no longer affects them directly, they have > less incentive to do the real job of abating abuse before it is sent. I'm not sure there's any technical solution to that problem. Alan DeKok.