Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:15:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> wrote: > in fact, they will be fully authorised to spew junk and destroy your > reputation. so you take your business elsewhere -- but it won't > help. the reputation is tied to your domain name. So your reputation doesn't recover when you move the domain elsewhere? Wow, you hold grudges for a *long* time. > contrast this with CSV. Which does something else entirely, so comparisons aren't really appropriate. > it also means that if you happen to be hosted by an irresponisible > company, you can take your business elsewhere, to a host which may > already have good reputation. the bad reputation is left behind > with the bad server. And no one, of coure, will make the connection between "bad IP" and "your domain is at that IP", so it will be impossible for anyone to decide that the IP's bad reputation will affect your domain's reputation. Where SPF ties reputations to domains, CSV ties it to IP's. Since domains are hosted at IP's, it's not a terribly large leap of faith to use CSV to tie reputation to domains, too. And CSV can't prevent this leap, so we can guarantee that people will be using CSV to affect domain reputation. At that point, much of your argument against SPF applies to CSV. Alan DeKok.