Re: Mail Server Registries and Foreign Sender Authentication: A Proposal
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:33:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Organization | <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
HECTOR SANTOS wrote: > But the old school FTN net police insisted on FTN1 and rejected > applications, registrations of any person installing newer and > better software if it didn't have FTN1 support. Nobody was forced to use it for sending mail, unless that person was a *C obliged to test that applicants can receive FTN1 mails. I needed FTN1 for crash mails (rarely, but still). > The one thing the FTSC had control of was the NodeList Nope. The FTSC was the standards committee, like IETF/IESG/IAB. The NodeLists were controlled by the *Cs (ultimately the ZCs of the relevant zones), that's like ICANN. The FTSC controlled the definition of the nodelist format (in theory, never changed in my time), not the content. Frank