Re: Clarification required
"Sam K. Sankoorikal" <[email protected]> Mon, 02 Dec 2002 10:54:08 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nat |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wipro Technologies |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Rajiv,
Thanks for the elabourate mail. Everything is very clearly
explained. However, your mail fails to give reason for why the OID
natConfAddrMapEntryType has to remain read-create. I have pointed out
reasons why it can be changed to read-only and yet give out the relevant
information to the user. Infact, in the natConfAddrMapTable every other
attribute needs to be read-create, but how do we specify the
natConfAddrMapEntryType in the case of dynamic? Please give me an
example for such a possibility.
Please be kind enough to let me know reasons for why it has to
remain a read-create OID. In my view: if it remains a read-create OID
then the user is forced to set a value while creating the row, which
will have to be rejected at the agent end, if it is specified as dynamic
[NAT or NAPT] mapping.
Thanks and Regards,
Sam.
Rajiv Raghunarayan wrote:
>Hi Sam,
>
>A typical NAT config and usage would be as follows:
>
>1. Define the translations/address maps. E.g. local address:
> 10.0.0.0/24, global address: 64.0.0.0/24 (ports may also be
> involved, but I've ignored it for simplicity).
>
> This is done by the network administrator, based on the
> addresses available/in use and the network configuration.
> At this stage, depending on various factors (e.g. ratio of
> internal hosts v/s available external addresses, future
> expansion, accessibility necessary for hosts/servers etc.),
> the network administrator also decides whether the mapping
> must be static or dynamic, what type of NAT (basic, napt)
> needs to be used etc.
>
>2. Depending on the mapping type i.e. static/dynamic (and, of
> course, implementation) BINDs are created in the BIND table
> either immediately or when the traffic flows from/to the
> addresses defined in the address map.
>
> The BINDs created are based off the address maps defined
> earlier. E.g. 10.0.0.1 => 64.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 => 64.0.0.2.
>
> In case of static address maps, the BINDs are defined and
> fixed at the time of the address map definition i.e. the
> number of local address will be equal to the no. of
> external addresses and these will have one-to-one mapping
> as defined above (again ignoring ports for simplicity).
>
> In case of dynamic address maps, the BINDs are defined
> only when the traffic flows. The number of local address
> needn't be (and usually aren't) same as the no. external
> addresses. This is, therefore, a dynamic mapping.
>
>>From a MIB perspective, the natConfAddrMapTable represents
>the translation/address mapping definition (step #1 above).
>The entries in this table may be created via SNMP, or any
>other means (CLI, HTTP etc.). The actual BINDs (as created
>in step #2 above) are represented by the natAddrBind and
>natAddrPortBind tables in the MIB.
>
>-Rajiv.
>
>>"Sam K. Sankoorikal" wrote:
>>
>>Hi Rajiv,
>>
>> Good Day!
>>
>> I have gone through section 4.3 of the NAT-MIB . I quote the
>>section:
>>
>>" - Setting the natConfStatus to 'active'(1) will enable
>> nat on the interface. Note that the associated entries in the
>> natConfAddrMapTable and natConfProtTable (if any) must also
>> be made active.
>> - The Address Bind and Address-Port Table will have the entries
>> created due to this nat configuration. A Management Station may
>> also, if deemed necessary, create entries Address Bind or a
>> Address-Port Bind entry and link those entries to the
>>appropriate
>> address map configured. "
>>
>>The above section does not tell us the values to be set in case you
>>needed to create an entry in the natConfAddrMapTable. ie what value
>>would I have to set natConfAddrMapEntryType to go on and create an
>>entry
>>
>>NatConfAddrMapEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
>> natConfAddrMapName SnmpAdminString,
>> natConfAddrMapIndex Integer32,
>> natConfAddrMapEntryType INTEGER,
>> natConfAddrMapDirection INTEGER,
>> natConfLocalAddrType InetAddressType,
>> natConfLocalAddrFrom InetAddress,
>> natConfLocalAddrTo InetAddress,
>> natConfLocalPortFrom Integer32,
>> natConfLocalPortTo Integer32,
>> natConfGlobalAddrType InetAddressType,
>> natConfGlobalAddrFrom InetAddress,
>> natConfGlobalAddrTo InetAddress,
>> natConfGlobalPortFrom Integer32,
>> natConfGlobalPortTo Integer32,
>> natConfProtocol BITS,
>> natConfAddrMapStorageType StorageType,
>> natConfAddrMapStatus RowStatus
>>}
>>
>>natConfAddrMapEntryType OBJECT-TYPE
>> SYNTAX INTEGER {
>> static (1),
>> dynamic (2)
>> }
>> MAX-ACCESS read-create
>> STATUS current
>> DESCRIPTION
>> "This config parameter can be used to set up static
>> or dynamic address maps."
>> ::= { natConfAddrMapEntry 3 }
>>
>>I also quote Rohits' input:
>>Static Address assignment
>> In the case of static address assignment, there is one-to-one
>>address
>> mapping for hosts between a private network address and an external
>> network address for the lifetime of NAT operation. Static address
>> assignment ensures that NAT does not have to administer address
>> management with session flows.
>>Dynamic Address assignment
>> In this case, external addresses are assigned to private network
>> hosts or vice versa, dynamically based on usage requirements and
>> session flow determined heuristically by NAT. When the last session
>> using an address binding is terminated, NAT would free the binding
>>so
>> that the global address could be recycled for later use. The exact
>> nature of address assignment is specific to individual NAT
>> imp
>>lementations.
>>(The functionality has been described. More could be added on how we
>>would configure the same)
>>
>>Based on the above definition of dynamic NAT it seems that the
>>NatConfAddrMapEntry 's which are dynamic are created on the fly, on a
>>need basis by the NAT module/protocol and can't be exactly specified
>>as dynamic and created by a user through SNMP. However if we wanted to
>>configure a Static NAT entry then that configuration could be created
>>by the user by specifying other [Direction, Addresses, Ports,
>>protocols] OID value other than the natConfAddrMapEntryType. This
>>value will be derived. Hence I think it would be clearer if the
>>natConfAddrMapEntryType were given a max access of read-only. This is
>>something which cannot be specified by the user. To tell more about
>>the dynamic entries I think by enabling NAT on an interface and
>>running a network application using NAT, then dynamic NAT entries
>>would be created. The same could be repeated for NAPT.
>>
>>natConfAddrMapEntryType OBJECT-TYPE
>> SYNTAX INTEGER {
>> static (1),
>> dynamic (2)
>> }
>> MAX-ACCESS read-only
>>Thanks and Regards,
>>Sam.
>>
>>--
>> [ ] Sam K. Sankoorikal.
>> Home Net Solutions ,
>> Wipro Technologies
>> Ganapa Complex,
>> #53/1 Hosur Rd Madivala,
>> Bangalore, India 560068
>> PBX: +91 80 5502001 extn 3114
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Name: Wipro_Disclaimer.txt
>> Wipro_Disclaimer.txt Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
>> Encoding: 7bit
>>
>