Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D5A643CC-8122-4382-B126-EDCFC9AF9BFA__32709.7059147947$1501796245$gmane$org@nostrum.com> |
Thanks, your response resolves all my comments. Ben. > On Aug 3, 2017, at 3:30 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] >> Envoyé : jeudi 3 août 2017 00:14 >> À : The IESG >> Cc : [email protected]; Jouni Korhonen; dmm- >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >> Objet : Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with >> COMMENT) >> >> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email >> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory >> paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I have a few editorial comments/nits: >> >> - There are several acronyms that should be expanded on first mention. >> (including at least a couple that are expanded on _second_ mention (MAG and >> LMA). >> >> - 3.2, "Per-packet management" bullet: The second sentence does not make >> sense. >> > > This sentence will be removed > >> - 3.2, last paragraph: Are we really talking about the latency introduced by per- >> packet management, or jitter (i.e. variation in latency)? >> > > We are talking about jitter. It will be clarified in next release. > >> - 4.1, definition of "Interface Label": This doesn't really define the term "interface >> label". It talks about how it is used, but not what it represents. >> > > You're right... We will add definition of interface label in the terminology section. _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm