Re: Call for adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document

Hello Sri,

Could you summarize Suresh's comments regarding the acceptance of 
segment routing within [6man] WG?  I think it is relevant to this 
discussion.

Regards,
Charlie P.


On 11/14/2017 4:02 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
> Folks:
>
> The following message commences a two week call for opinions on the 
> adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as a DMM 
> Working document.
>
> ---
> The DMM working group is considering adopting the draft, 
> "draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03” as a working group 
> document. The chairs have polled the room for opinions during IETF100, 
> and it was determined that there is good support for taking up this 
> work. The chairs would like to confirm the same in the mailing list. 
>  Please provide your feedback.
>
> Document Link:
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03.txt
>
> Slides:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/slides-100-dmm-srv6-for-mobile-user-plane/
>
> Background:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/slides-100-dmm-mobile-data-plane-evolution-motivation-goals/
> ---
>
> Regards
> Dapping & Sri
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm