Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: (with COMMENT)

Hi Roman,

Thanks for your review. Please see inline below.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:29 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I support Ben Kaduk’s DISCUSS point.
>

[CB] I've just replied to Benjamin's review, addressing all his comments.


>
> Section 5.  To provide symmetry with the IPSec recommendation, s/IKEv2
> should/IKEv2 SHOULD/
>
>
> [CB] OK, fixed in version -15 to be submitted. Thanks.

Carlos

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm