Re: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CALypLp-pB6zgJfZyoOxC7Yeh8UYKWfWR=WMwd1zeTh_NMQf=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vincent,

Thanks a lot for your review. Please see inline below for my comments.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:57 PM Vincent Roca via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Vincent Roca
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> Summary: Has Nits
>
> Thank you for the clarification of the Security Considerations section.
> I just have a minor comment and a typo.
>
> - It is said (section 6):
>   "The CMD SHOULD use a pacing approach to limit
>    this amplification risk."
> I agree, but where do you intend to apply pacing? In the incoming queue
> (i.e.,
> by delaying some PBU/PBA messages) or in the outgoing queue (i.e., to limit
> output traffic), or both? It's a bit unclear.
>

[CB] I meant limiting the output traffic. I've clarified this in version
-06 (to be submitted soon).


>
> - Typo: remove one "exist" in sentence: "there may exist multiple previous
> (e.g., k) MAARs exist."
>
> [CB] Fixed, thanks.

Thanks again for your comments.

Carlos


> Regards,    Vincent
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.