Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam,

Thanks a lot for your review. Please see inline below for my comments.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:20 AM Adam Roach via Datatracker <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for the work on this document. I have only one editorial suggestion.
>
> Section 3.6:
>
> >   to-point link) with MN1, exposing itself as a (logical) router with a
> >   specific MAC (e.g., 00:11:22:33:01:01) and IPv6 addresses (e.g.,
>
> Please use a MAC address from the range reserved for documentation
> purposes by
> section 2.1.1 of RFC 7042.
>

[CB] Thanks. Addressing a comment from Éric I've ended up removing the MAC
address in the text, so this is not necessary, though I'll keep it in mind
in case we need to mention a MAC address.

Thanks,

Carlos

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm