Re: requesting feedback on draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-06

Thanks John for the detailed message and updates in the 06 version of this.

Dear All,

As I indicated,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-07 was mostly a
refresh.


We are seeking to request WG adoption of this soom and would be happy to
hear any feedback before too.

--
Uma C.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:16 PM Kaippallimalil John <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We submitted draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-06 prior to the IETF meeting
> in March.
>
> Since there was no dmm session, we are requesting for feedback on the
> mailing list.
>
>
>
> The authors believe that all the feedback from IETF 106 have been
> incorporated into the new version:
>
>    1. VLAN as a means to convey MTNC-ID (Huawei)
>    *Action*: Added new chapter 2.2 on Front haul describes scenario and
>    VLAN, L2 mechanisms.
>    2. Document sections to describes provisioning; second which describes
>    user plane handling (Huawei)
>    *Action*: revised figures, chapters etc to address the comment.
>    Provisioning and user plane handling are separate (at least sub chapters)
>    3. Source port range /mechanisms (Dave) – already addressed in draft.
>    *no action* needed.
>    4. Source port checksum (Suresh)
>    *Action*: add text in draft to state that UDP /GTP encap is from E2E.
>    Checksums are not affected.
>    Checksum clarification added in chapter 2.7
>    5. 3GPP operator/IPSec Gateways (Altiostar):
>    *Action*: Revision to address how the this works in the presence of
>    IPSec gateways – added in section 2.6
>
> Would appreciate reviews and suggestions.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> John
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm