Re: New Version Notification for draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-07.txt

Thanks Kaushik for your comments. Need a quick clarification (see below ..)

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:29 PM Majumdar, Kausik <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Uma et all,
>
>
>
> Thanks for putting together this draft to describe the framework for
> mapping the slices in 5G mobile systems to transport slices in IP towards
> the UPF. This framework is valuable and we are actually looking for further
> extensions of the TN characteristics in non-mobility domain (SD-WAN) and
> that is being worked out to be submitted in RTG WG.
>

Thanks.


>
>
> I would also request you to consider the Security Characteristics in
> addition to the current Transport Path characteristics. Preserving the
> security characteristics in non-mobility SD-WAN domain would be an
> important aspects. My suggestions would be to extend the current SST for
> secure traffic. As a result, it would be good if we can define additional
> UDP Source Port range to capture the Security characteristics for the
> current service types.
>

We already described the generic case where security is applied (section
2.6), when the user plane emits the packet to transport (could be N3/N9
interfaces or S1U interface terminating at SGWs).
That addresses mostly shared transport cases.
If I understand correctly, you want security done by PE's before gNB/UPF??
I can imagine few usef of this but can you explain why you are looking for
this option?


>
>
> I would be happy to share more context on the use cases and discuss
> further on the approaches.
>

Sure. But is this a mandatory option for your E2E use case with
SD-WAN beyond mobility domain?

--
Uma C.


>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kausik
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm