Re: Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

"Majumdar, Kausik" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <BY5PR14MB414559BDC78DBC4157344EA1FAD00@BY5PR14MB4145.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,

I support the adoption of this draft. I think, the current Transport Network Aware Mobility for 5G draft defines well the framework for mapping the 5G mobile systems Slice and Service Types (SSTs) to the corresponding underlying network paths in the mobility domain. This framework allows us to expand the network characteristics beyond mobility domain to main end to end traffic behavior.


The current draft has been expanded to have separate sub-ranges under each SST to provide the TE path in preserving the security characteristics for certain mobile traffic. That is an important aspect for SD-WAN hybrid use cases where traffic needs to be characterized for secure vs. un-secure tunnel in the data network.

I think authors addressed several comments in the version 08 and it is in a decent shape. As a contributor, I support the WG adoption to continue our discussion and improve it further.

Regards,
Kausik

From: dmm <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 10:45 AM
To: dmm <[email protected]>
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Folks: The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG meetings. There have been good amount of d
External ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)
Report This Email<https://shared.outlook.inky.com/report?id=Y29tbXNjb3BlL2thdXNpay5tYWp1bWRhckBjb21tc2NvcGUuY29tLzE0YmI2ZjMzNjlhOWViMjU4ZWVkNzA3ODA0ZTIyOTIzLzE2MDkzNTM5NDMuNzE=#key=a3f7cc2e909c53994c82b5fcc8e41037>  FAQ<https://www.inky.com/banner-faq/>  Protection by INKY<https://www.inky.com>

Folks:

The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG meetings. There have been good amount of discussions in the mailers and there is some level of interest for the work from the community. We are therefore considering the adoption of this document as a DMM WG document, to be moved on Informational Standards track.

Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WDfi-3-42R1Si7ArQ_WdEXOIKEgLFIOTDy1zQhY8GS3ldosVuyNBNPQoZn39UEYYmyE16zxyNX-UcbNCCNPY0OUWtifobwYIfHH8WZC4NjOqm4LTakDLGI3RJnRItcrwoIKQmhcY7qUSz8kR4xgwGGFOwwUe9wUXCnJF71XZ2YSej_h4Tm7sJ23jGb1jP1nPHTj7Tnq2FqJ_EuzLf2zTGxVC6YJRreykY70Ax4fY6Jf_QsnI5rg55vIDOb6zURamEfKDB5h-9Pevc8m1_Darbc83LnzSmSjwZ-Re60LrEdez8TJ5BEM9BRauAHIneyGr/https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08>


With this background, we would like to ask the WG to provide some feedback on their interest for this work. Please provide substantial comments as why this SHOULD be adopted, or why it SHOULD NOT be adopted. If there is interest, and if there are no other concerns from AD/IESG/Others, then we may take up this work.

The adoption call will end on 18th of January, 2021.

Regards
DMM WG Chairs

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.