Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

As I believe I said earlier, I consider this work to be inappropriate 
for the IETF and the working group.

Developing SRv6 is an IETF activity. We have done and are doing that.
Developing any needed extensions to address 3GPP requirements should be 
done in conjunction with 3GPP based on their requirements.  3GPP has not 
expressed any such requirements.
When other standards bodies have redefined the architecture of our 
protocols, we (the IETF) have objected.   And for good reasons.

Therefore, we owe other standards bodies the same respect.  We should 
not produce standards (this is a standards track document) that modify 
other bodies architectures.

Yours,
Joel

On 4/7/2021 1:35 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
> Working Group:
> 
> As we discussed in the last IETF meeting, we are issuingWGLCon 
> draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.
> 
> The document went through several revisions and there were good amount 
> of reviews on this document. I am very pleased with the quality of this 
> document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no 
> open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document 
> is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working 
> group.
> 
> The following message commences a two weekWGLCfor all feedback.
> 
> Document Link:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.txt 
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.txt>
> 
> Please post any comments/concerns on this document.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Sri
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> 

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm